Saturday, May 14, 2011

Infoxication: More Is Less


By ALFONS CORNELLÁ

Some time ago I was bold enough to coin a new term in Spanish which has enjoyed a certain degree of success: infoxicación. I invented this word -whose literal equivalent in English would be infoxication- to describe information overload, or information intoxication, i.e. when you have more information to process than is humanly possible and suffer anxiety as a result. The technical term is information fatigue syndrome. Infoxication is now a very real problem in our society - although this also makes it a great source of opportunities. When I coined the term, Google did not yet exist. Spam was still just an idea in the head of some ignored visionary. The situation today is far worse than we could ever have imagined.

In terms of the quantity of information you receive per second, broadband just keeps on getting fatter and fatter. We are constantly bombarded by stimuli from emails, audio recordings, videos, telephones and text messages. It is getting easier and easier to send a byte wherever you like. However, the critical human information parameter, attention, is the complete opposite of broadband: the amount of time we can devote to each input is getting less and less, because we have to divide the finite amount of time we have available among more and more information components. It is our attention that is in short supply.

We need to design tools to cut down the information noise we receive and make our attention time more productive. In fact, we already have tools to do this, but we don't use them properly. For example, we can use RSS feeds to automatically receive updates from websites of interest to us without having to visit them. This is a far-reaching evolution from mass media to my media. The trouble is being selective enough when signing up for these services.

In my opinion, the critical issue is communicating more effectively. It is about synthesising the message and presenting it more attractively, combining text and images and any other format that enriches it and aids comprehension. Telling stories rather than giving information. Matching what you want to communicate with the attention time of the person receiving it, i.e. knowing when to catch them when they are in the best frame of mind to digest the information being sent. Presenting information in a handy, appetising diet, since it is fresh information that surprises us, not what we already know. Because information that arrives with no criteria or interest is simply noise. Irritating noise.

I also recommend Sergio Fanjul's recent article on the same topic in Spanish: Atentos a todo ... y a nada.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Turkey's Islamization

Young lovers gathered on a bus in Istanbul last Saturday to make a kissing protest following last week’s “sex bus” incident. On April 17, a fight broke out between a bus driver and a couple (boy+girl) he accused of being too intimate after he allegedly warned the couple, saying, “This is not a place for sex.” An investigation into the event was launched the following day. The protest took place in İstanbul on Saturday night when a group of lovers gave each other passionate kisses on an İETT (İstanbul's municipal bus company) in İstanbul. The peaceful protest took place as a reaction to last week's incident; according to reports, a young straight couple were removed from an İETT bus after boarding the bus hand-in-hand and staying ‘too close’. “This is not a sex-bus!” yelled the bus-driver, according to the victims of the weird intervention and to witnesses. It was only six days after the incident when a facebook-organised crowd of couples gathered on an İETT bus in central Taksim (İstanbul's most popular square) and sent chills down an İETT driver’s spine! The group of couples kissed each other on the bus in front of the wide-eyed bus driver and his other ‘common’ passengers, in support of the couple who was removed from another bus about a week ago.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

23/4: Which book made a difference for you?_survey

Which was the book that made you discover the pleasure of reading?
Who was the person who advised you to read it, lent it to you, gave it to you as a present or made you read it?
What literary work would you memorize to save it from fire?

If inspired by the survey, post your contribution below. Thanks :)

HAPPY THANK YOU MORE PLEASE_film

HAPPY THANK YOU MORE PLEASE captures a generational moment - young people on the cusp of truly growing up, tiring of their reflexive cynicism, each in their own ways struggling to connect and define what it means to love and be loved. A very entertaining, must-hear film, especially for student s of English. Now showing in town in the original version!

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Orhan Pamuk: My Father's Suitcase


What follows are two excerpts of Orhan Pamuk's lecture upon accepting the Nobel Prize for Literature on December 7, 2006. To access the complete speech click here.

A writer is someone who spends years patiently trying to discover the second being inside him, and the world that makes him who he is: when I speak of writing, what comes first to my mind is not a novel, a poem, or literary tradition, it is a person who shuts himself up in a room, sits down at a table, and alone, turns inward; amid its shadows, he builds a new world with words. This man – or this woman – may use a typewriter, profit from the ease of a computer, or write with a pen on paper, as I have done for 30 years. As he writes, he can drink tea or coffee, or smoke cigarettes. From time to time he may rise from his table to look out through the window at the children playing in the street, and, if he is lucky, at trees and a view, or he can gaze out at a black wall. He can write poems, plays, or novels, as I do. All these differences come after the crucial task of sitting down at the table and patiently turning inwards. To write is to turn this inward gaze into words, to study the world into which that person passes when he retires into himself, and to do so with patience, obstinacy, and joy. As I sit at my table, for days, months, years, slowly adding new words to the empty page, I feel as if I am creating a new world, as if I am bringing into being that other person inside me, in the same way someone might build a bridge or a dome, stone by stone. The stones we writers use are words. As we hold them in our hands, sensing the ways in which each of them is connected to the others, looking at them sometimes from afar, sometimes almost caressing them with our fingers and the tips of our pens, weighing them, moving them around, year in and year out, patiently and hopefully, we create new worlds...

Let me change the mood with a few sweet words that will, I hope, serve as well as that music. As you know, the question we writers are asked most often, the favourite question, is; why do you write? I write because I have an innate need to write! I write because I can’t do normal work like other people. I write because I want to read books like the ones I write. I write because I am angry at all of you, angry at everyone. I write because I love sitting in a room all day writing. I write because I can only partake in real life by changing it. I write because I want others, all of us, the whole world, to know what sort of life we lived, and continue to live, in Istanbul, in Turkey. I write because I love the smell of paper, pen, and ink. I write because I believe in literature, in the art of the novel, more than I believe in anything else. I write because it is a habit, a passion. I write because I am afraid of being forgotten. I write because I like the glory and interest that writing brings. I write to be alone. Perhaps I write because I hope to understand why I am so very, very angry at all of you, so very, very angry at everyone. I write because I like to be read. I write because once I have begun a novel, an essay, a page, I want to finish it. I write because everyone expects me to write. I write because I have a childish belief in the immortality of libraries, and in the way my books sit on the shelf. I write because it is exciting to turn all of life’s beauties and riches into words. I write not to tell a story, but to compose a story. I write because I wish to escape from the foreboding that there is a place I must go but – just as in a dream – I can’t quite get there. I write because I have never managed to be happy. I write to be happy...

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

8 Reasons Why We Love Kids :)

1. A kindergarten pupil told his teacher he’d found a cat. She asked him if it was dead or alive. “Dead,” she was informed. “How do you know?” she asked her pupil. “Because I pissed in its ear and it didn’t move,” answered the child innocently. “You did WHAT?!?” the teacher exclaimed in surprise. “You know,” explained the boy, “I leaned over and went ‘Pssst!’ and it didn’t move.”

2. A small boy is sent to bed by his father. Five minutes later. . . . “Daaad. . . .” “What?” “I’m thirsty. Can you bring a drink of water?” “No. You had your chance. Lights out.” Five minutes later: “Daaaaad. . . . “ “WHAT?” “I’m THIRSTY. Can I have a drink of water??” “I told you . . . NO!” “If you ask me again, I’ll have to spank you!” Five minutes later. . . . . “Daaaaaaaad. . . . “ “WHAT!” “When you come in to spank me, can you bring a drink of water?”

3. An exasperated mother, whose son was always getting into mischief, finally asked him, “How do you expect to get into heaven?” The boy thought it over and said, “Well, I’ll run in and out and in and out and keep slamming the door until St. Peter says, ‘For Heaven’s sake, Dylan, come in or stay out!’”

4. One summer evening, during a violent thunderstorm, a mother was tucking her son into bed. She was about to turn off the light when he asked with a tremor in his voice, “Mommy, will you sleep with me tonight?” The mother smiled and gave him a reassuring hug. “I cant dear,” she said. “I have to sleep in Daddy’s room.” A long silence was broken at last by his shaky little voice: “The big sissy!”

5. It was that time, during the Sunday morning service, for the children’s sermon. All the children were invited to come forward. One little girl was wearing a particularly pretty dress and, as she sat down, the pastor leaned over and said, “That is a very pretty dress. Is it you Easter Dress?” The little girl replied, directly into the pastor’s clip-on microphone, “Yes, and my Mum says it’s a bitch to iron.”

6. When I was six months pregnant with my third child, my three-year-old child came into the room when I was just getting ready to get into the shower. She said, “Mummy, you are getting fat!” I replied, “Yes, honey, remember Mommy has a baby growing in her tummy.” “I know,” she replied, “but what’s growing in your butt?”

7. A little boy was doing his math homework. He said to himself, “Two plus five, that son of a bitch is seven. Three plus six, that son of a bitch is nine . . . .” His mother heard what he was saying and gasped, “What are you doing?” The little boy answered, “I’m doing my math homework, Mom.” “And this is how your teacher taught you to do it?” the mother asked. “Yes,” he answered. Infuriated, the mother asked the teacher the next day, “What are you teaching my son in math?” The teacher replied, “Right now, we are learning addition.” The mother asked, “And are you teaching them to say two plus two, that son of a bitch is four?” After the teacher stopped laughing, she answered, “What I taught them was, two plus two, THE SUM OF WHICH, is four.”

8. One day the first grade teacher was reading the story of Chicken Little to her class. She came to the part of the story where Chicken Little tried to warn the farmer. She read, “. . . . and so Chicken Little went up to the farmer and said, “The sky is falling, the sky is falling!” The teacher paused, then asked the class, “And what do you think that the farmer said?” One little girl raised her hand and said, “I think he said: Holy Shit! A talking chicken!”

Thursday, April 14, 2011

14 de abril

República

MANUEL VICENT

Existen reservas naturales a las que no se puede acceder sin un permiso especial y gracias a la protección de las leyes algunas islas, ciertos parajes, se mantienen todavía incontaminados. Esos espacios preservados sirven entre otras cosas para purificar también nuestra mente por el solo hecho de viajar a ellos con el pensamiento. Aunque sea imposible llegar al corazón virgen de la naturaleza, para sentirse igualmente limpio basta con imaginar que en algún lugar del planeta aún quedan ríos azules, valles intactos no especulados y montes donde subsisten las mismas plantas autóctonas desde el cuaternario. En cierto sentido la Segunda República es también una reserva política que habita en la mente de muchos españoles sin la necesidad de volver a ella sino con la imaginación, como un ejercicio regenerador y didáctico. La República supuso en la historia de España una corriente de aire puro de renovación basada en la inteligencia, en la libertad, en la cultura y en la justicia social, que terminó en un baño de sangre. Aunque para algunos ciudadanos la Constitución de 1931 fuera un hecho nefasto, la causa de toda desdicha, aquella aspiración de modernidad frustrada por la violencia fraticida supone para otros españoles un hito nostálgico, como un amor perdido de juventud. Pero por fortuna el recuerdo de la Segunda República estará siempre asociado a las flores de acacia de mitad de abril, a la Niña Bonita del azar, a una primavera inevitable, que se renueva cada año como un lugar iniciático adonde uno debe volver para regenerarse políticamente. Sin duda el recuerdo de aquel tiempo está dorado por el polvo amarillo. Puede que aquellos próceres republicanos que venían del regeneracionismo con el empeño de una España europeísta, laica, racional y progresista fueran unos ingenuos cuyo sueño se vio devorado por las fuerzas ancestrales de la España negra, pero su estela quedó en suspensión en la atmósfera y cada abril se posa en el inconsciente colectivo. Si la República es hoy una meta inalcanzable, no por eso deja de ser una reserva espiritual, un paradigma político de la memoria, lo mismo que ese territorio imaginario donde se extienden litorales todavía vírgenes y discurren ríos azules en cuyas aguas es obligado volver siempre a bañarse. 
El País, 17/04/2011

Thursday, March 31, 2011

B2 Modal Verb Exercises_March

Complete with the appropriate tense/form of a modal auxiliary verb (e.g. CAN/ MAY/SHOULD/MUST/NEED etc.) and the appropriate form of the verb in parentheses.

Exercise A
I was delighted last Friday when my boss told me that I ____________________________ (work) that afternoon as we’d already done all the important business. I _____________________________ (do) any Christmas shopping before that, so I took the opportunity to go round the shops for a couple of hours, but when I got back home I realised my keys weren’t in my handbag. I remembered putting them into my bag when I left the office, so I decided they __________________________ (fall) out somehow while I was shopping. That was the only explanation. My neighbours have a spare key and although it was a bit early, I thought that if I was lucky they _____________________________ (have) dinner just then, but no-one answered the door. Luckily, another neighbour lent me a ladder, and with great difficulty, I ___________________________ (get) in through an extremely small open window upstairs.

Exercise B
One of the best places to go on a trekking holiday is the Australian outback, but I don’t think you ____________________________ (go) unless you’ve got some experience. I ____________________________ (be) about 18 when I first went there because I had already left school. Unfortunately, I got bitten by a snake. We’d been told to look out for them, so I ___________________________ (hide) in the bushes to get a better look at a kangaroo without making sure there weren’t any snakes first. I was very lucky because the guide reacted really quickly and ___________________________ (get) the poison out, but my leg was very painful and they ______________________________ (take) me to the nearest hospital where I was given several injections and that was the end of my trekking holiday.

Exercise C
A) I'm sorry I didn't go to the beach with you last weekend. If I ____________________ (work) on Saturday, I would certainly have gone. You look tanned, so the weather ______________________ (be) good.
B) Yes, much better than here. By the way, did you know that Patricia has lost her job in the clothes shop?
A) What? She ______________________ (give) the sack already! She only started working there last week!
B) Well, it seems that a lot of money went missing from the till and the owner accused her of taking it.
A) Patricia is incapable of stealing. In fact, she ______________________ (be) the most honest person I know. Perhaps another shop assistant took it or it ______________________ (even/steal) by the shop manager.

Saturday, March 26, 2011

El laicismo como ficción

CONCHA CABALLERO
El País Andalucía, 26 de marzo de 2011

Atónitos nos hemos quedado al conocer que el grupo de estudiantes que exhibieron sus torsos en la capilla de la Universidad Complutense fueron detenidas como peligrosas delincuentes. Patidifusos, cuando nos hemos enterado que se le imputan dos graves delitos contemplados en el código penal y, finalmente, indignados al saber que se acepta una querella criminal de la asociación ultraderechista Manos en Alto, perdón, Manos Limpias.

Vivimos en la ficción de pertenecer a un país laico, nos pavoneamos de nuestro avance cultural y civilizatorio pero estamos instalados en el "quiero y no puedo" de una sociedad que predica no ser confesional mientras mantiene la religión en todos sus espacios públicos e incluso reserva varios artículos en el código penal -y subrayo penal- para castigar a los que se burlen de las creencias religiosas.

El actual código penal tipifica la profanación con penas de hasta dos años de prisión y la ofensa los dogmas, creencias o ritos religiosos con penas de multa de ocho a doce meses. Un artículo, el 525, de extraña aplicación, porque como compensación contiene una segunda parte que penaliza con iguales condenas a los que hagan públicamente escarnio de quienes no profesan religión o creencia alguna.

De su aplicación se sigue que, si las jóvenes estudiantes cometieron -no una falta o una simple falta de educación- sino un delito contra las creencias religiosas, la Iglesia católica, así como los medios afines, incurren de forma habitual en este mismo delito cuando en numerosos actos públicos denuncian la homosexualidad, se manifiestan contrarios a la igualdad de derechos de las mujeres, o consideran un asesinato la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo, ya que se trata de declaraciones en las que ofenden a todas las personas que no profesan sus mismas creencias. Si los agnósticos y ateos hubiesen ido al juzgado o a la comisaría cada vez que se han visto ridiculizados, censurados e insultados por los representantes de la iglesia y sus apologetas no habría bastantes juzgados en nuestro país para tramitar las denuncias.

Nada de esto ocurriría si las creencias religiosas se situaran en el terreno de lo privado y no se pretendieran imponer, de una u otra forma, a través de las instituciones del estado. El laicismo, lejos de ser un arma contra tal o cual religión, es una garantía del respeto del estado a la conciencia individual y es la base de una convivencia respetuosa con todas las creencias. Muy mal debe ir una religión cuando sólo se puede mantener por una posición de privilegio y de confrontación.

La presencia de capillas, crucifijos y símbolos religiosos abarca todos los espacios de nuestra vida: numerosos hospitales andaluces mantienen en lugares preferentes capillas reservadas al culto católico dentro de sus instalaciones; son muchos los institutos donde falta espacio para las clases pero tienen recintos religiosos; la Diputación de Almería está presidida por un gran Cristo crucificado y, en la toma de posesión de un buen número de Ayuntamientos andaluces, junto a la Constitución española, se coloca un crucifijo testigo de la toma de posesión de los cargos públicos. Pero la presencia más chocante y contradictoria es en la Universidad donde se proclama el pensamiento científico mientras se permanece bajo la advocación de santos y vírgenes. Por si queda alguna duda de esta incompatibilidad, el arzobispo de Granada nos ha aclarado que "la ciencia es peor que la Educación para la Ciudadanía" y ha apuntado que el origen de todos los males que aquejan a la sociedad es "el culto a la razón y la Ilustración francesa". Varios siglos después de que los ilustrados proclamaran la separación de Iglesia y Estado, todavía se debate en los claustros universitarios si se suprimen las capillas, las misas o el patronazgo de quienes defienden la superstición o el misterio frente a la ciencia. ¿De verdad estamos en el siglo XXI?

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Young Saudis, Vexed and Entranced by Love’s Rules

By MICHAEL SLACKMAN 
The New York Times, 12 May 2008

Puede que los jóvenes de Arabia Saudí se sientan incómodos ante las exigencias cultu­rales y religiosas de la sociedad más conservadora del mundo musulmán e incluso es posible que a veces intenten eludirlas. Pero también pueden ser muy crueles en su condena hacia los que las desobedecen con demasiado descaro. Y lo que destaca en docenas de en­trevistas con hombres y mujeres jó­venes era su compromiso total con la perpetuación de las reglas. Eso da a entender que la estricta interpretación del islam que se hace en Arabia Saudí, a la que apenas se opone la nueva generación dentro del país y que se difunde en el extranjero gracias al dinero saudí, moldeará ca­da vez más la forma en que viven los musulmanes de todo el mundo. Veamos el ejemplo del joven Nader al-Mu­tairi.


She’s never met the man she’s marrying: it’s love, the Saudi way. Michael Slackman offers a rare insight into the closed world of Saudi Arabia and its bizarre and highly risky mating rituals. Nader al-Mutairi stiffened his shoulders, clenched his fists and said: “Let’s do our mission.” Then the young man stepped into the cool, empty lobby of a dental clinic, intent on getting the phone number of one of the young women working as a receptionist.

Asking a woman for her number can cause a young man anxiety anywhere. But in Saudi Arabia getting caught with an unrelated woman can mean arrest, a possible flogging and dishonour, the worst penalty of all in a society where preserving a family’s reputation depends on faithful adherence to a strict code of separation between the sexes.

Above all, Nader feared that his cousin Enad al-Mutairi would find out he was breaking the rules. Nader is engaged to Enad’s 17-year-old sister, Sarah. “Please don’t talk to Enad about this,” he said. “He will kill me.”

The sun was already low as Nader entered the clinic. Almost instantly, his resolve faded. His shoulders drooped, his hands unclenched and his voice began to quiver. “I am not lucky today; let’s leave,” he said.

It was a flash of rebellion, almost instantly quelled. In the West, youth is typically a time to challenge authority. But what stood out in dozens of interviews with young men and women in Saudi Arabia was how completely they have accepted the religious and cultural demands of the Muslim world’s most conservative society. They chafe against the rules, even at times try to evade them, but they can be merciless in their condemnation of those who flout them too brazenly. And they are committed to perpetuating the rules with their own children.

That suggests that Saudi Arabia’s strict interpretation of Islam, largely uncontested at home by the next generation and spread abroad by Saudi money in a time of religious revival, will increasingly shape how Muslims around the world will live their faith. Young men like Nader and Enad are taught that they are the guardians of the family’s reputation, expected to shield their female relatives from shame and avoid dishonouring their families by their own behaviour. It is a classic example of how the Saudis have melded their faith with their desert tribal traditions.

“One of the most important Arab traditions is honour,” Enad said. “If my sister goes in the street and someone assaults her, she won’t be able to protect herself. The nature of men is that men are more rational. Women are not rational. With one or two or three words, a man can get what he wants from a woman. If I call someone and a girl answers, I have to apologise. It is a violation of the house.”

Enad is the alpha male, a 20-year-old police officer with an explosive temper and a fondness for teasing. Nader, 22, is soft-spoken, with a gentle smile and an inclination to follow rather than lead. They are more than cousins; they are lifelong friends and confidants. That is often the case in Saudi Arabia, where families are frequently large and insular.

They are average young Saudi men, residents of the nation’s conservative heartland, Riyadh, a flat, clean city of 5m that gleams with oil wealth. It offers young men very little in the way of entertainment, with no movie theatres and few sports facilities. If they are unmarried, they cannot even enter the malls where women shop.

Nader sank deep into a cushioned chair in a hotel cafe, sipping fresh orange juice, fiddling with his cellphone. If there is one accessory that allows a bit of self-expression for Saudi men, it is their cellphones. Nader’s is filled with pictures of pretty women taken from the internet, tight face shots of singers and actresses. His ringtone is a love song in Arabic. “I’m very romantic,” Nader said. “I don’t like action movies. I like romance. Titanic is No 1. I like Head Over Heels. Romance is love.”

Three days later, in a nearby restaurant, Nader and Enad were concentrating on eating with utensils, feeling a bit awkward since they normally eat with their right hands.

Suddenly the young men stopped focusing on their food. A woman had entered the restaurant alone. She was completely draped in a black abaya, her face covered by a black veil, her hair and ears covered by a black cloth pulled tight. “Look at the Batman,” Nader said derisively, snickering.

Enad pretended to toss his burning cigarette at the woman, who by now had been seated at a table. The glaring young men unnerved her. “She is alone, without a man,” Enad said, explaining why they were disgusted, not just with her but with her male relatives, too, wherever they were. “Thank God our women are at home,” Enad said.

Nader and Enad pray five times a day, often stopping whatever they are doing to traipse off with their cousins to the nearest mosque. Prayer is mandatory in the kingdom and the religious police force all shops to shut during prayer times. But it is also casual, as routine for Nader and Enad as taking a coffee break.

To Nader and Enad, prayer is essential. In Enad’s view, jihad is too, not the more moderate approach which emphasises doing good deeds, but the idea of picking up a weapon and fighting in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Jihad is not a crime, it is a duty,” Enad said in casual conversation. “If someone comes into your house, will you stand there or will you fight them?” He was leaning forward, his short, thick hands resting on his knees: “Arab or Muslim lands are like one house.”

The concept is such a fundamental principle, so embedded in their psyches, that they do not see any conflict between their belief in armed jihad and their work as security agents of the state. As a police officer, Enad helps to conduct raids on suspected terrorist hideouts. Nader works in the military as a communications officer.

Each earns about 4,000 riyals a month, about £500, not nearly enough to become independent from their parents. But that is not a huge concern, because fathers are expected to provide for even their grown children, to ensure that they have a place to live and the means to get married. To many parents, providing money is seen as more central to their honour than ensuring that their children get an education.

Each young man has the requisite moustache and goatee and most of the time dresses in a traditional robe. Nader prefers the white thobe, an ankle-length gown; Enad prefers beige.

But at weekends they opt for the wild and crazy guy look, often wearing running pants, tight short-sleeved shirts, bright colours, stripes and plaids together, lots of Velcro and elastic on their shoes.

There are eight other children in the house where Enad lives with his father, his mother and his father’s second wife. The apartment has little furniture, with nothing on the walls. The men and boys gather in a living room off the main hall, sitting on soiled beige wall-to-wall carpeting, watching a television propped up on a crooked cabinet. The women have a similar living room, nearly identical, behind closed doors.

The house remains a haven for Enad and his cousins, who often spend their free time sleeping, watching Oprah with subtitles on television, drinking cardamom coffee and sweet tea – and smoking.

Enad and Nader were always close, but their relationship changed when Nader and Sarah became engaged. Enad’s father agreed to let Nader marry one of his four daughters. Nader picked Sarah, although she is not the oldest, in part, he said, because he actually saw her face when she was a child and recalled that she was pretty.

They quickly signed a wedding contract, making them legally married, but by tradition they do not consider themselves so until the wedding party, set for this spring. During the intervening months they are not allowed to see each other or spend any time together.

Nader said he expected to see his new wife for the first time after their wedding ceremony – which would also be segregated by sex – when they are photographed as husband and wife.

“If you want to know what your wife looks like, look at her brother,” Nader said in defending the practice of marrying someone he had seen only once, briefly, as a child. That is the traditional Nader, who at times conflicts with the romantic Nader.

Soon his cellphone beeped, signalling a text message. Nader blushed, stuck his tongue out and turned slightly away to read the message, which came from “My Love”. He sneaks secret phone calls and messages with Sarah. When she calls, or writes a message, his phone flashes “My Love” over two interlocked red hearts. “I have a connection,” he said quietly as he read, explaining how Sarah manages to communicate with him.

His connection is Enad, who secretly slipped Sarah a cellphone that Nader had bought for her. These conversations are taboo and could cause a dispute between the two families. So their talks were clandestine, like sneaking out for a date after the parents go to bed.

Enad keeps the secret but it adds to an underlying tension between the two, as Nader tries to develop his own identity as a future head of household, as a man. Enad teases Nader, at one point saying: “In a year you will find my sister with a moustache and him in the kitchen.”

“Not true,” Nader said, mustering as much defiance as he could. “I am a man.”

Another flashpoint: the honeymoon. Nader is planning to take Sarah to Malaysia and Enad wants to go. He suggests that Nader owes him. “Yes, take me,” Enad says, with a touch of mischief in his voice.

Nader cannot seem to tell if he is kidding. “You know, he can be crazy,” Nader said. “He’s always angry. No, he is not coming. It is not a good idea.”

Nader grew up in Riyadh and his parents, like Enad’s, are first cousins. Enad says his way of thinking was forged in the village of Najkh, 350 miles west of Riyadh, where he lived until he was 14 with his grandfather. It is where he still feels most comfortable.

When he can, he has a cousin drive him to his grandfather’s home, a one-storey concrete box in the desert, four miles from the nearest house. There is a walled-in yard of sand with piles of wood used to heat the house in the cold desert winters.

Inside there is no furniture, just a few cushions on the floor and a prayer rug. Enad is quiet and hides his cigarettes when his grandfather comes through. He would never tell his father or grandfather that he smokes and remains stone-faced when a cousin mentions that another of his cousins, a woman named al-Atti, 22, is interested in him. The topic came up because another cousin, Raed, had asked al-Atti to marry him and she refused.

The conflict and flirtation touched on so many issues – manhood, love, family relations – that it sparked a flurry of whispering and even Enad was drawn in.

Al-Atti had let her sisters know that she liked Enad, but made it clear that she could never admit that publicly. So she asked a sister to spread the word from cousin to cousin and ultimately to Enad. “It’s forbidden to announce your love. It is impossible,” she said.

Word finally reached Enad, who tried to stay cool but was clearly interested and flattered. At this point Enad was himself whispering about al-Atti, trying to figure out a way to communicate with her without actually talking to her himself. He asked a female visitor to arrange a call and then pass along a message of interest.

Enad said it was never his idea to pursue her but that a man –a real man – could not reject a woman who wanted him. To get his cousin Raed out of the picture, he suggested that al-Atti’s brother take Raed to hear al-Atti’s refusal in person, at her house. “From behind a wall,” Enad said.

“Love is dangerous,” al-Atti said as she sat with her sisters in the house. “It can ruin your reputation.”

Monday, March 07, 2011

Circus Oz


Breathtaking feats, serious fun, and Australian humour for audiences of all ages.
Circus Oz was born in Melbourne, Australia in 1978. The company's 30th birthday year marked three successful decades of international touring, as well as confirming its place in the hearts of generations of Australians. From New York to Hong Kong, Circus Oz has taken its self-crafted performances of wit, grace and spectacle to 26 countries across five continents, to critical acclaim. The Circus Oz show is a rock-n-roll, animal free circus that adults and children can enjoy together. Expect two hours of breathtaking agility, death-defying stunts, awe-inspiring acrobatic performances, irreverent comedy and a spectacular live band.
Circus Oz has a strong belief in tolerance, diversity and human kindness. For many years the company has engaged in issues associated with social justice and a good time for all, including work each year with many charities, indigenous communities and the raising of nearly $250,000 in donations to support refugees and asylum seekers.
Now performing at Madrid's Teatro Circo Price until March 27.

Triumph of the City. How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier and Happier

Esplendor de las ciudades

ANTONIO MUÑOZ MOLINA, Babelia 05/03/2011

Qué invento asombroso, la ciudad. La ciudad grande, la ciudad viva, la ciudad en la que buscan y encuentran trabajo los emigrantes pobres y asilo los fugitivos, la ciudad en la que uno disfruta tan plenamente de la soledad como de la compañía, a la que sueñan con irse los sometidos al tedio y a la extenuación del trabajo campesino, los que desean aprender y ejercer oficios fantasiosos, en la que podrán escapar de la vigilancia escrutadora de sus semejantes los que mantienen oculta su diferencia; la ciudad ciudad, donde a cualquier hora del día y a veces de la noche hay gente por la calle y locales abiertos; o en la que un sistema eficiente de transporte público permite viajar hasta sus últimos confines en líneas de autobuses o en redes de metro en las que nunca falta el misterio del encuentro con los desconocidos, el del viaje por laberintos de corredores y escaleras. En Nueva York o en Madrid salgo de casa e inmediatamente me sumerjo en el gran río de la vida, que arrastra igual el esplendor que la basura, como el río Hudson arrastra y mece con idéntica magnanimidad troncos que flotan entre dos aguas con algo de caimanes, gansos circunspectos, hojas del último otoño, latas de cerveza, condones expandidos hasta tamaños improbables después de una larga estancia en las aguas. La computadora, el coche, la casa confinada en una urbanización, aíslan del mundo, o lo ofrecen con una docilidad engañosa al capricho: compras online exactamente lo que te apetecía en este momento; muestras tu preferencia por una opción política o una película o una perversión; no corres el menor peligro de encontrarte con algo o con alguien que no formaran parte de tus preferencias más específicas.

En la ciudad, nada más pisar la calle, comienza el aprendizaje de lo inesperado. La estética de la ciudad es el collage y la enumeración caótica. Salí esta mañana de domingo a comprar hortalizas, queso, leche y fruta en el mercado de los granjeros que instalan cada semana sus tenderetes a lo largo de la acera de la Universidad de Columbia y por el camino encontré por sorpresa, en diversos puestos callejeros, una hucha de porcelana policromada que es un jovial marinero de los años treinta con su petate al hombro, un disco de Lena Horne, una edición de segunda mano de las tragedias de Eurípides. Un poco más allá de los cajones donde los granjeros venden patatas o manzanas o zanahorias y nabos y remolachas que todavía huelen a tierra olorosa brilla al sol un edificio magnífico de Rafael Moneo destinado a laboratorios, chocante en este paisaje de arquitecturas sólidas y venerables y a la vez sutilmente vinculado con ellas. Casi a la puerta del club Smoke me crucé con un contrabajista que iría a tocar durante las horas del brunch. Un hombre llevaba de la mano a su hijo de siete u ocho años que aprendía a mantener el equilibrio sobre unos patines. Un emigrante mexicano tal vez ilegal atendía el puesto de flores de una frutería coreana. En un banco a la puerta de un pub irlandés unos bebedores con aire de solvente veteranía aprovechaban el sol y la calidez inesperada del aire para demorarse fumando sus cigarrillos antes de volver a la penumbra interior. El neón rosa de la Juanito's Barber Shop brillaba débilmente en la claridad del mediodía. En un breve tramo de acera se sucedían una tienda de colchones, el taller de un zapatero remendón, un concesionario de teléfonos móviles, una ferretería regentada por hoscos barbudos paquistaníes o afganos, una panadería que se llama Silver Moon y desde la que se expande por la acera un olor alimenticio de panes y bollos y cafés, una papelería en la que me apeteció de pronto comprar cuadernos y rotuladores. En menos de un kilómetro puedo atravesar las más diversas latitudes de las cocinas populares del mundo: comida india, comida china, comida japonesa, comida italiana, comida mexicana, tailandesa, comida chinoperuana exquisita y barata. En la planta de arriba del restaurante Mamá México, que los domingos acoge a grandes familias charladoras y comilonas amenizadas por mariachis, hay un centro de acupuntura, yoga y taichí.

En cualquier gran ciudad es posible una caminata equivalente, un despliegue de expectativas que no parecen tan valiosas y tan singulares como son porque ya estamos acostumbrados a ellas. La ciudad también tiene atascos de tráfico, polución, hacinamiento, pobreza, contrastes obscenos entre la marginalidad y el privilegio. Tan abundante como la literatura que retrata y celebra las ciudades es la que se dedica a denigrarlas. En la ciudad está la corrupción de cualquier inocencia, el ruido que vuelve insoportable la vida, el aislamiento, el anonimato, el delito. El júbilo indiscriminado de Walt Whitman tiene su reverso en la vindicación pastoral de Miguel Hernández, o de Fray Luis de León, o del mismo Lorca, que disfrutó en Nueva York mucho más de lo que dejó traslucir en sus poemas sobre la ciudad. La beatitud ecologista parece exigir casas aisladas en el campo, pueblos pequeños en los que el aire está más limpio y los alimentos todavía saben cómo tienen que saber.

Junto a los ventanales del café del nuevo edificio de Moneo miro el tráfico de la calle y el desfile plural de la gente por la acera y leo un libro que me hace más consciente de la complejidad y el valor de lo que estoy viviendo: Triumph of the City, de Edward Glaeser, un economista de Harvard que ha adquirido su erudición leyendo al parecer todo lo que se ha escrito sobre todas las ciudades y paseando por todas ellas, por Nueva York y Mumbai, por París, por Barcelona, por Kinsasha, por Detroit. Glaeser dice que la ciudad es la más importante creación humana: que fomenta la inventiva, el talento individual, la tolerancia, la prosperidad, la cooperación. Las ciudades no hacen pobre a la gente: atraen a gente pobre que quiere dejar de serlo. Las grandes ciudades son más respetuosas con el medio ambiente que las célebres arcadias ecologistas, porque la gente tiende a moverse por ellas caminando o en transportes públicos: los habitantes de Nueva York gastan como media un 40% menos de energía que los de las zonas residenciales o rurales del país. La ingeniería necesaria para suministrar agua saludable a las ciudades y retirar de ellas la basura es una proeza épica contada por Edmund Glaeser. Vivir entre la densa población de una ciudad es más seguro que hacerlo en una casa aislada en el campo. También, estadísticamente, es más saludable. Para no convertirse en boutiques monumentales en las que solo puedan habitar los ricos y los turistas las ciudades históricas necesitan renovarse con inteligencia y audacia y levantar edificios altos con una oferta de vivienda suficiente para que los precios no sean abusivos. A pesar de la pobreza y la violencia la esperanza de vida es más alta en una favela de Río de Janeiro que en los pueblos del interior del país. Leer a Edward Glaeser le da a uno el mismo ímpetu para caminar y fijarse en todo que las Hojas de hierba de Whitman o el Fervor de Buenos Aires de Borges.

Triumph of the City. How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier and Happier. Edward Glaeser. The Penguin Press, 2011.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

The King's Speech_film

The story of King George VI of Britain, his impromptu ascension to the throne and the speech therapist who helped the unsure monarch become worthy of it.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010

Elogio de la lectura y la ficción

El discurso de Mario Vargas Llosa previo a la ceremonia de entrega del Premio Nobel de Literatura está transido de humanidad y eso lo hace grandioso. Ensalza la literatura como la mayor y más colosal obra humana por la sencilla razón de que con ella no hay nada imposible. Y es que se trata de un don divino, nos hace imperecederos, dejando para la historia recuerdos de nuestro tiempo.
Por eso Mario anima a escribir cuentos y versos, a relatar los entuertos de personajes diversos, a glosar grandes hazañas, a contar los desafueros convirtiendo la escritura en quizá el mejor remedio para hacer todo posible con tan simples instrumentos, y es que la literatura es sin duda un gran invento. Los más inimaginables retos alcanzados por la humanidad han sido previamente glosados por alguna mente iluminada y privilegiada que supo avanzarse a su tiempo y que marcó nuevos horizontes.
El espectro que abarca el arte de escribir es inabarcable, no hay nada que se le resista porque la imaginación es infinita, llega a todas partes e interesa a todo el mundo. La historia de la literatura es la obra más grande jamás contada y Vargas Llosa ya forma parte de ella.
En su discurso, titulado Elogio de la lectura y la ficción, el reciente Premio Nobel relató con emoción su descubrimiento de la lectura a los cinco años, la lectura de poemas con su madre, los libros de Flaubert y Faulkner, la política, los nacionalismos y otros fanatismos, así como la decepción ante la Revolución Cubana y otros acontecimientos que marcaron el siglo XX. Comenzó así:

Aprendí a leer a los cinco años, en la clase del hermano Justiniano, en el Colegio de la Salle, en Cochabamba (Bolivia). Es la cosa más importante que me ha pasado en la vida. Casi setenta años después recuerdo con nitidez cómo esa magia, traducir las palabras de los libros en imágenes, enriqueció mi vida, rompiendo las barreras del tiempo y del espacio y permitiéndome viajar con el capitán Nemo veinte mil leguas de viaje submarino, luchar junto a d’Artagnan, Athos, Portos y Aramís contra las intrigas que amenazan a la Reina en los tiempos del sinuoso Richelieu, o arrastrarme por las entrañas de París, convertido en Jean Valjean, con el cuerpo inerte de Marius a cuestas...

Para leer el texto íntegro, abrir el siguiente documento pdf:

Foto

'Elogio de la lectura y la ficción'

DOCUMENTO (PDF - 51Kb) - 07-12-2010

Thursday, December 02, 2010

Leaks_El Roto

Como arrastrada por la maldición del código binario, Internet ha vuelto a colocar a la sociedad contemporánea ante un conflicto aparentemente irresoluble, una encrucijada que involucra al periodismo, la política y las nuevas tecnologías. El caso Wikileaks nos muestra con toda claridad el modo en el que el flujo de información marca hoy una nueva fase de las relaciones humanas, con difícil encaje en la política tradicional.
La batalla entre el imperativo de confidencialidad y la libertad de expresión, cuyos "efectos colaterales" hemos visto estas semanas, y cuyas implicaciones finales atañen al funcionamiento mismo de la democracia, trae los ecos de polémicas que han marcado la historia del periodismo, pero también resulta inédita en muchos aspectos. Sin Internet y sin la moderna tecnología de compresión de datos, valga la obviedad, no existiría el Cablegate. Es inimaginable una filtración como esta hace dos décadas: no solo por la facilidad para hurtar los archivos, sino por la ausencia de un mecanismo de fácil acceso a la información filtrada. Si algo hemos aprendido estos días es que la Red representa el único reto serio a ciertos poderes constituidos, capaz de garantizar de facto la posibilidad de un estado de transparencia como el que hoy defienden Wikileaks y sus seguidores... Lo esencial es que una sociedad abierta nunca debe castigar el acceso a la verdad. ERNESTO HERNÁNDEZ BUSTO

Trescientos años antes de Wikileaks, Kant dijo: "Obra de tal manera que tus actos puedan ser tomados como normas universales de conducta". Las filtraciones de Wikileaks abren una era en la que la enseñanza de Kant adquiere un nuevo enfoque.
Nuestros secretos, nuestras dobleces e hipocresías pueden salir a la luz. Ciertamente, es una perspectiva desasosegante, ya que con la exposición de nuestros actos a los ojos de los demás sentimos que perdemos autonomía y libertad. Y ésta es una de las acusaciones que se hace a Wikileaks: romper un "secretismo necesario".
La revolución que propone Wikileaks parece ser la de obligar a Estados, poderes en general, y quién sabe si en un futuro a los individuos, a acatar la máxima de Kant y obrar de tal manera que nada tengamos que ocultar, o por lo menos a hacernos responsables de cómo obramos. Teniendo en cuenta cómo nos ha ido a los humanos admitiendo como válido el secreto, tal vez habría que dar una oportunidad a la transparencia. ALBANO DANTE FACHIN

Friday, November 26, 2010

Students of English at the cinema

Some of the forty IdI students who turned up at the Avenida Cinema, in Seville, before and after watching a special screening of Stephen Frear's hilarious comedy Tamara Drewe in English with subtitles, and having a few laughs while learning some new expressions and some saucy language, hahaha:)

Monday, October 18, 2010

Unmasking the Tea Party

Writer and journalist Irene Lozano offers a discerning reflection on the emergence ot the extremist, right-wing Tea Party in the United States in her article "La rebelión de las élites", published yesterday in El País. I am sending you a short quote and a link to the complete article in case you are interested in reading the rest of it. It is both thought-provoking and worth reading, as it helps us understand the world we live in better.

...Los seguidores del Tea Party... son revolucionarios en esta época de aparente flacidez ideológica. Se sienten enajenados del poder, pues tradicionalmente había sido ocupado por su nación y por el sujeto histórico que ellos representan. Y ahora deben competir por el dinero, el puesto de trabajo, el estatus o la autoridad intelectual con seres antaño periféricos que solían quedar descalificados para la carrera antes de empezar. Nadie ha vulnerado sus derechos, pero al materializarse su extensión a toda la población, sienten que se les han arrebatado sus viejos privilegios, lo cual es rigurosamente cierto. La no discriminación y el reparto del poder acaban cristalizando en la presencia de un negro en la Casa Blanca, una boda gay o ese G-20 donde los brasileños opinan sobre la economía mundial. En ese momento, el varón blanco conservador de mediana edad se subleva. Si Ortega viviera, ¿no llamaría a este fenómeno "la rebelión de las élites"?

Los teapartyers proclaman su rebeldía contra "el despotismo de Washington", y piden la partida de nacimiento de Obama porque conceden menos legitimidad a las urnas que a la tierra de nacimiento, reivindicación que adquiere ribetes ridículos en un país como Estados Unidos. Son furibundamente antipolíticos, pero no como lo fueron los anarquistas españoles hace un siglo, cuando la política era el coto reservado de la oligarquía, sino ahora, porque ven que la democracia, tomada en serio, acaba con las preferencias ventajosas de cualquier grupo social.

...La rebeldía de las élites adquiere un carácter reaccionario: cuando el establishment favorece la revolución lo hace con el propósito de perpetuar su dominio. Quieren detener en alguna zanja el reparto de poder para restaurar aquel mundo jerárquico y ordenado en que se sentían seguros de su hegemonía y solo disputaban con sus iguales. Naturalmente, se ha visto algún negro en sus manifestaciones y no faltan en sus candidaturas mujeres como Christine O'Donnell, la revelación del Tea Party en las primarias republicanas de Delaware. Además de condenar la homosexualidad y equiparar la masturbación con el adulterio, el matonismo retórico de O'Donnell defiende el papel de esposa y madre para las mujeres...

Thursday, September 16, 2010

NOPE = NO

We, the undersigned, share the view that Pope Ratzinger should not be given the honour of a state visit to this country. We believe that the pope, as a citizen of Europe and the leader of a religion with many adherents in the UK, is of course free to enter and tour our country. However, as well as a religious leader, the pope is a head of state, and the state and organisation of which he is head has been responsible for:

Opposing the distribution of condoms and so increasing large families in poor countries and the spread of Aids.

Promoting segregated education.

Denying abortion to even the most vulnerable women.

Opposing equal rights for lesbians, gay, bisexual and transgender people.

Failing to address the many cases of abuse of children within its own organisation.

The state of which the pope is head has also resisted signing many major human rights treaties and has formed its own treaties ("concordats") with many states which negatively affect the human rights of citizens of those states. In any case, we reject the masquerading of the Holy See as a state and the pope as a head of state as merely a convenient fiction to amplify the international influence of the Vatican.

Stephen Fry, Professor Richard Dawkins, Professor Susan Blackmore, Terry Pratchett, Philip Pullman, Ed Byrne, Baroness Blackstone, Ken Follett, Professor AC Grayling, Stewart Lee, Baroness Massey, Claire Rayner, Adele Anderson, John Austin MP, Lord Avebury, Sian Berry, Professor Simon Blackburn, Sir David Blatherwick, Sir Tom Blundell, Dr Helena Cronin, Dylan Evans, Hermione Eyre, Lord Foulkes, Professor Chris French, Natalie Haynes, Johann Hari, Jon Holmes, Lord Hughes, Robin Ince, Dr Michael Irwin, Professor Steve Jones, Sir Harold Kroto, Professor John Lee, Zoe Margolis, Jonathan Meades, Sir Jonathan Miller, Diane Munday, Maryam Namazie, David Nobbs, Professor Richard Norman, Lord O'Neill, Simon Price, Paul Rose, Martin Rowson, Michael Rubenstein, Joan Smith, Dr Harry Stopes-Roe, Professor Raymond Tallis, Lord Taverne, Peter Tatchell, Baroness Turner, Professor Lord Wedderburn of Charlton QC FBA, Ann Marie Waters, Professor Wolpert, Jane Wynne Willson

Thursday, September 02, 2010

100 Places to Remember

100 Places to Remember Before they Disappear features 100 photographs from one hundred different places around the world in risk of disappearing or seriously threatened by climate change.

The pictures are taken by some of the world's best photographers and all the places are based on reports from UN´s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

On this website you can see the photographs and find further information and news about climate change and their project.